Not exceptional circumstances

Weather Radar

The failure of the onboard weather radar is not an "exceptional circumstance" (AG Rüsselsheim, ruling 27.02.2012-3 C 2644 / 11-33;.. Just as AG Erding, 5 C 197/09). In addition, the following cases are not "exceptional circumstance" is: a hydraulic leak on the elevator control -; (AG Rüsselsheim, ruling of 25/03/2011 3 C 289/11.). the failure of the elevator display (AG Rüsselsheim, ruling of 23.11.2011 -3 C 1552 / 11-36, RRa 2012 26..); fuel leakage (AG Cologne, ruling of 09.04.2010 - 124 C 407/09;.. AG Hannover, ruling of 22.01.2014 - 526 C 7704/12..); a defect in the fuel pump (AG Frankfurt, ruling of 27.06.2013 -.. 30 C 1055 / 13-29.
No "exceptional circumstance" applies when two independently operating motors (the function of a valve control) fail (AG Rüsselsheim, ruling of 31.05.2010 -.. 3 C 146/10, RRa 2011, 55). At no "exceptional circumstance" it depends though on the on-board computer, a valve defect appears (AG Rüsselsheim, ruling 19.7.2010 -.. 3 C 257 / 10-35, RRa 2011, 56). Even if a weather radar product is precipitated in an airplane spoken by any "exceptional circumstance" (AG Emden, ruling of 27.01.2010 -.. 5 C 197/09, RRa 2010, 135).
This is also true for the blockage of toilets by passengers. Each air carriers to the improper conduct of its passengers adjust (AG Rüsselsheim, ruling of 12.09.2011 -3 C 1047/11;.... AG Cologne, ruling of 09.12.2011 - 145 C 15/11).

What Our Customers Rated Us

Outstanding

Rating star

Claim Flights helped many airlines passengers for their compensation claims and they are happy with us. See what our customers rated us: 9.5 from 10 star based on 354 Reviews..

TRUSTPILOT